Showing posts with label delivery. Show all posts
Showing posts with label delivery. Show all posts

What's the best way to get a perfectly even hormone delivery?

You can't.

No, really. It's a myth. Yes, we know the notion that this will solve all of our hormonal ills is a very popular, very prevalent theme in hrt discussions online. But it's really neither possible nor necessarily desirable.

Shocking, no? Yes, we do understand that the ups and downs of the various delivery routes can be problematic, causing all sorts of unpleasant symptoms. But that doesn't mean that the attempt to do away with them by taking ever more frequent ever tinier doses is going to work. That's right: even if we were to walk around with a constant IV drip of estrogen, we still wouldn't eliminate fluctuation.

That doesn't mean that we can't smooth things out, but it does mean that we need to look into the situation a little more intently to determine what exactly it is that needs to be fixed.

Life isn't a perfectly stable system


To begin with, nothing around us is perfectly stable. Today we are stressed by a deadline at work; tomorrow we will have a cold; the day after that is our birthday and we'll have that surprise party even though you know how we feel about surprises. Everything around us changes and our bodies are built to cope with that. We need that ability to cope, because there will always be something out there, a stress good or bad, or even the relief of stress.

Our interactions with the world affect our hormone supplies as well as the demands upon them. We eat foods that contain estrogens, either as plant estrogens or as hormones given to commercial meats or as estrogenic pesticides applied to plants and coating them or eaten by the animals we then go on to eat. We drink water supplies into which every day vast quantities of drugs and pesticides are flushed and, because their content is not legislated, we never see test results to show us how very many things are still in our "clean" water. Every molecule of the hormonally-active compounds we consume becomes a part of our hormone reservoir, a reservoir that changes from moment to moment, hour to hour, day to day.

Neither is our body


Our endocrine system (that portion of our physiology to do with hormonal regulation of various functions) is itself not a static system.

First, our bodies need to be able to keep things running in that ever-changing world we live in. We need reserves to allow us to cope, to ramp things up when we're facing stress and to ramp things down when stress eases off.

And we need to maintain cycles of our own. We may have been accustomed to the cycles of fertility, but there are many more cycles in our bodies. One of the most important is our daily cycle of sleep and waking, the latter encompassing various stages of alertness and, well, not so much.

Our estrogen is a critical component of our daily cycle. Our levels naturally are highest in the morning, fall gradually during the day and evening, and reach their lowest point around 4 or 5 am. This cycle keys in with with many other hormone cycles, including that of melatonin, another hormone that helps regulate our sleep cycle. It also interacts with thyroid hormone as part of our metabolic regulation. If estrogen levels were completely static, our whole system would come adrift from this important regulatory relationship. And if our hrt were absolutely continuously stable, we'd spend most of our time with either too much or too little to meet our bodies' demands during our daily cycle.

Change, then, is both an inescapable part of both internal and external hormonal regulation and response. But that doesn't mean that it doesn't pose challenges when we do it to ourselves with our hrts.

But the ups and downs are killing me!


The problem is that our body wants to regulate things so we stay on a fairly even keel amidst all of these changes. We work hard, all the time, to do so. When that doesn't happen, of course, the resulting temporary imbalance and the shifts of it coming and going all cause symptoms that can range from annoying to devastating. And it's a feature of our response to change that the greater the fluctuation, the greater the response to it will be.

The most comfortable hrt, then, is going to be one that eases into our bodies with the least disruption, is taken at a dose that lasts long enough that its falling effectiveness meets the rise of the next dose without either great troughs or peaks, and provides a reservoir of hormonal potential to get us through the times of day when we must respond to a need for greater hormonal activity. And as it turns out, none of that actually requires anything like a completely continuous supply.

Minimizing the ups and downs due to uptake


There are two important facets of getting hrts into our bodies. First, they have to physically get into our systems and, second, they need to impact our circulation in a fairly tolerable manner. Both of these factors can present us with problems when hrt characteristics are a mismatch for our personal capabilities.

In dealing with the first problem, we need a delivery method that our bodies can absorb smoothly and reliably. A patch that is stuck now and flapping later isn't going to do that; instead, it will provide us with a roller coaster of ups and downs. Oral deliveries may not work reliably for all women. A gel might be sweat off on the days we go to the gym. All hrt delivery routes have ways they can fail to work smoothly, and so when we're not happy with how a dose is taken up by our bodies, we need to take a close look at just what kinds of interference we might be experiencing at this very basic level of delivery.

But it's not enough to get those hormones into our bodies effectively. We also have to weather the rise in circulating hormone levels. Each hrt will create a slightly different uptake curve if you plot out the amount of hormone in our blood over time. A patch will start delivering fairly rapidly, but if the previous patch was exhausted and our hormone support from it had dropped, even the small dose delivered by a patch will be seen as a sharp uptick by our bodies. Some individuals find that the rapid absorption of a whole day's transbuccal dose doesn't dissipate rapidly enough to prevent being hit by something of a slam.

Each hrt has its own time and type of uptake. When we are troubleshooting these, we can look at alternatives that might perform differently. For example, if a cream transdermal dose seems to provide too abrupt an uptake to be comfortable, perhaps the slower uptake of a gel would be more gentle while still otherwise providing a transdermal profile of effects.

But an often-neglected aspect of uptake has to do not so much with delivery route but what specific hormone we're delivering. When we're taking estradiol, we're using the active form of the hormone. If we dump a day's estradiol into our systems at once, we may have trouble moving quickly enough to convert the portion of it that we don't need to have active at that exact moment into the inactive reserve form, estrone. If this is the case, our dose might give us a fierce headache or palpitations or excessive jumpy nervousness.

For those who experience this problem, it’s possible to get around this effect somewhat by switching to an hrt that contains some or all estrone. That way, the net total hormone support delivered in a dose cycle is still provided, but the initial slam of excessive activity can be dodged. Not all of us experience this problem, but for those who do, this can be a highly productive direction to explore. This is especially true for those who suffer from migraines when they take estradiol, perhaps because the two estrogen versions affect somewhat different areas of the brain.

Minimizing the ups and downs due to duration


If the dose of hrt we take doesn't last until the next dose is taken, our hormone support will taper down far enough that both its decline and the rise of the next dose's uptake will cause uncomfortable fluctuations. While users often address this gap by trying to take smaller doses more frequently, that often doesn't provide a fully satisfactory coverage, not to mention becoming increasingly impractical.

A common misunderstanding of the concept of "half life" often drives this attempted solution. "Half life" in medical terms is simply how long it takes for half of a dose to be metabolized. The fact that a dose is half gone, however, doesn't mean that another full dose is needed; it only means that the body has taken its normal steps to process our hormone supply as it's used to meet our present needs.

If a dose interval is meant to be a full day, then, it's appropriate that the half life be 12 hours. That means we'll have used up most of yesterday's dose by the time we add today's. Yes, that's some up and down, but our body can handle a fair amount of variability through its own storage and retrieval mechanisms if we're not shorting ourselves down too far between doses. The other direction, taking a new dose before we've used up most of the last, only takes us into excess...and excessive risks. In fact, many individuals tune their dose exactly so that they do feel a bit short as the next dose comes due or so that they do have a hot flash or at least warm spell at that 5am low point in their daily hormone cycle, just so that they know they're skimming along the edge of "lowest effective dose."

So in practical terms, if an individual feels as though they're running out far too soon, they might do more good by re-examining their total dose amount and consider whether taking more would make it last longer and round out that dose period. Taking it more frequently only speeds up the cycle of ups and downs and doesn't really improve its coverage.

Minimizing the ups and downs due to reservoir


There's another factor, beyond simply how long the dose lasts, and that is the form in which it lasts.

Yes, the measured amount of our total hrt-provided intake goes up and then down, but focusing on that alone misses the fact that our overall hormone capacity is not represented by just one form. When is taking estradiol, an individual's body will normally move quickly to convert any excess beyond momentary need into estrone, which will exercise less activity. In the course of the subsequent dose interval, that estrone will gradually be converted back to active estradiol as current demand requires, throughout this period, to do more estrogen work.

We’re not sure of the physiology behind this, but some women seem more comfortable when they have a considerable reservoir on board. Now, that’s not an excess we’re talking about; we only mean the sort of buffer that a day’s dose provides. Those for whom this is the case often feel edgy and stressed, never quite comfortable in their bodies, on trickle-dosed hrts (patches, pellets, even gels), as though something isn’t right even though they may have lab tests that put them in an ostensibly normal hormone level range. Unfortunately, this is often the sort of situation in which they move to trying to manage their hrt levels even more closely—something that is actually moving in the wrong direction. Switching to daily dosing, which allows their bodies to regain and manage a reservoir to meet their fluctuating needs in a more natural process can help alleviate that problem and provide a better fit between hrt and how their body best functions.

This is vague. Also, confusing.


Yes, we know. We’re getting into the more subtle aspects of hrt “fit” here and there are no real rules, no body of research knowledge. By standard medical thinking, all pharmaceutical hrts must work exactly alike and if there’s a problem, it’s somehow with the patient.

But in the decades we’ve been watching hrt use and talking with women about what they’ve tried and experienced, these seem to be common trends and the strategies that seem to have good, durable results for dealing with them.

These aren’t recipes, however. We need to think about the ways our current hrt can be ill-suiting us and we need to know enough about hrts to know which ones hold different characteristics. This is way more subtle than the situation where if we try one patch at one dose and aren’t happy, our only option is whatever oral hrt our doctor most often prescribes. Our hrt pages here can help you with some of this (they're arranged by hormone, so check the Table of Contents for links). If nothing else, we hope that this will help keep you from wasting a lot of time and effort adding and subtracting bits of patch every hour during the day (yes, we’ve actually read accounts of women so desperate to get that impossibly even hormone state that they’ve tried this). And encourage you that there are some fairly subtle things that can be done to manipulate our hrts’ effects to make them fit better.

As ever, we’re more than happy to discuss this in greater detail on our forums. While we can’t provide answers for everyone, we can often ask questions to help them discover their own best answers.

Troubleshooting patches: location

There are two factors that affect patch performance that involve location.

The first is the purely mechanical. It doesn't matter how much the patch is capable of delivering if you can't keep it flat and adhered fully. This means that folds, rumples, areas of high clothing friction, and places with thick fine body hair are just not going to work well no matter where they are. Upper arm and thigh are some off-label locations that some women have reported satisfactory results with when they don't have enough suitable real estate in the mid-body areas.

As a rule, though, best results are obtained in the outer half of each body half, but not so far "around the edge" that there's a lot of curve to the location and not directly over an area where there is little padding over the bone or over large muscles.

The other location factor is that studies by manufacturers have shown that patch delivery (same patch, same dose, same degree of adhesion, different location) varies by 17-25% depending on whether it's on the front of your body or back. That is, locations on your butt deliver more to your system, from the same patch, than if it were placed on the front of your body.

Our speculation on this—and that's all that it is because it's not elucidated by the manufacturers—is that the large muscles in the butt (the same ones that make it a good location for shots) cause more circulation to the area when you move around, leading to the hormone being pumped away from the patch location at a more rapid pace. On the belly, unless we're seriously into muscle-building, that's less likely to be the case. This would correspond to the experiences women with little body fat or women who undergo a lot of weight/fat loss see, where they find that their patch dynamics are changed such that they may not be able to use patches satisfactorily any longer.

Now it's true that not every manufacturer includes this dosing variability in their product information, and that some state that the patch can only be used in one particular location. These cautions have more to do with the testing and approval process than actual patch dynamics, however. If the manufacturer does not go to the expense and time of specifically testing their product in multiple locations, they can't claim those results—only the ones they actually demonstrated in their FDA application can show up in their licensing. And because they can only claim those specific results, it's obvious that they can tell you that only that location works as specified. It's not that other variations don't work, won't work or have been determined not to work: it's just that they don't have the legal right to allow even that they might work without demonstrating this through specific testing.

There is nothing in the physiology of hormone uptake or the mechanical delivery of hormones from patches that would make one work in a specific location and not the other. In practical terms, it is entirely reasonable to generalize from the specific test data to general patch performance, leaving aside delivery variations due to specific patch qualities.

Further, this can be expanded to general considerations in patch placement. Aside from on or within the immediate circulatory feeders of breast tissue, there's virtually nowhere that is an absolute contraindication to patch placement. We'd have second thoughts about over some moles (for the same reasons as avoiding breast tissue), but otherwise, if the bottom of your foot is the only available real estate and you want to use a patch, there's not an obvious reason beyond the mechanical why that won't work. We have no idea what the delivery efficiency would be, but that can be deduced in practice.

The point is, then, that different underlying tissue types seem to affect your uptake (and provide a subtle way of manipulating that intake) for any two locations where the mechanics of sticking are equivalent. But because delivery is first and foremost dependent upon patch adhesion, locations where a patch won't stick just aren't in the running.

For more information on alternate locations and their dose delivery, plus more documentation on the importance of the tissue type underlying a patch, check out this other post looking at what we can learn from contraceptive patches. For help doing the math on how much difference location makes to a specific patch dose, please join us on our discussion forums.

Troubleshooting patches: adhesion

Because of the way it physically delivers hormones to our bodies, a patch must be 100% adhered to our skin 100% of the time in order to deliver the nominal patch dose. If it's not, even by a bit, the effectiveness of the patch is diminished by that amount. This means that getting a patch stuck down and keeping it that way is absolutely critical to using patch HRTs.

Skin prep


The first part of sticking a patch down involves preparing the skin for the patch. The most effective strategy seems to be washing the site thoroughly with a mild and pure soap—not something loaded with moisturizing oils but rather a something more like a glycerin cake or castile soap, for example.

Then dry it thoroughly. A hair dryer set on low is good for this, so that the site's not picking up lint from a towel.

Since putting a fresh patch on skin with dilated blood vessels from a hot shower can give us a nice little zap from the enhanced uptake, it's important to let the skin cool thoroughly.

Then it's time to apply the patch. Another session with a slightly warm hair dryer or holding a warm hand firmly on the patch for several minutes after it's applied, pressing it down fully and evenly, will help make the seal fully seat onto the skin.

As a final measure, a light dusting of powder (on top of the applied patch, not underneath or before applying it!) will reduce the sticky along the edges and help prevent peeling from sticking to clothing. You may need to renew the powder daily if the adhesive tends to extrude a bit with time.

Do not use benzoin or the skin prep pads sold to people with ostomies to help their appliances stick to the their skin—those will make the patch stick, perhaps, but interfere with hormone transfer from the patch into your body, which sort of negates the whole effort.

Don't use things like acetone or industrial solvents to clean the area before application—that's going to alter the skin's uptake and expose you to risks from those agents. If you have to resort to heavy chemicals, you're not a good candidate for a patch.

If you want to be extra-sure you've cleaned the skin of all oils, one patch manufacturer suggests wiping the area down well with an alcohol wipe. Rubbing alcohol on a tissue or cotton ball will work equally well—you don't need to buy the expensive packets of individual wipes (although they're handy for travel use). Be sure to fan the area (or give it another whoosh with the hair dryer) to be sure all of the alcohol has evaporated and the skin is fully dry before you apply the patch.

Last, do make sure that the skin is well smoothed out before putting the patch onto it. One of our discussion group members shared a tip she got from her patch manufacturer: when applying a patch to the butt, sit down to apply it. This obviously will stretch things out and help assure that when you sit down later, you're not ripping it loose as your skin stretches. Clever, eh? That won't, of course, help with patches in other locations, but we can take a lesson from this and make sure we do smooth and even stretch out the skin if it's an area where there normally is considerable stretch in the course of our daily activities.

Problems


Some women find that they have a lot of body hair and this presents them with adhesion problems. For them, careful shaving may be necessary—careful because nicking or scraping the skin will also alter the uptake of the patch and then provide a risk of infection when sealed beneath the patch for that many days. This isn't something to undertake unless patches spring up obviously standing away from the skin on hair—women who have a history of bandaid failures know what we're talking about here. Don't get into this unless you absolutely have to, and even then, it's a good reason to consider another HRT form.

If that doesn't do it for you, then you need to look at the actual mechanics of the problem. If it's just edges rolling up from clothing, perhaps more careful selection of application location would help. If the powder trick doesn't work, perhaps taping down the edges would—that's okay, so long as the edges are well-sealed to begin with and you're just protecting them, not sticking failed portions of the patch back down. If you tape edges and the patch remains fully stuck down right up until the time when you peel it off to change it, you're okay; anything less than that total adhesion and you're fooling yourself (and not your body) with the tape. Don't take the tape off and replace it if it starts to curl, though—that's just going to lift the patch with it.

Some women who develop rashes under patches like to use an over-the-counter steroid ointment to facilitate that healing. We're not sure that any degree of irritation that takes drugs to recover from is being all that kind to our bodies in the long run, but in the overall scheme of balancing risks and benefits, we'll have to leave that one up to you. Remember, though, that different brands of patch have different chemical constituents in the adhesive, and so a rash from one brand will not necessarily happen with another.

After bathing


If you use body moisturizer after your showers, be sure to skip the place where you're going to put your fresh patch. It's fine to use a regular moisturizer, if it doesn't sting, where the old patch was. After all, that area is probably going to see another patch in a couple weeks, so making sure it's healthy and recovered is just right.

The dreaded goo-and-lint aftermath


Once you've removed the patch, you may be left with that unattractive lint-and-goo ring. This is also not the time to reach for heavy industrial solvents that aren't meant for use on skin that's just spent days underneath an airtight barrier. Instead, try a light coating of vegetable or nut oil or body butter. Let it sit on the goo for a few minutes, then shower. You should be able to wash the now-softened goo off with your usual soap and washcloth.

It still doesn't work


Finally, keep in mind that each patch adhesive is by definition (and patent) different. If one brand doesn't stick for you but you love patches as a concept, for goodness sake try the rest of the brands to see if another might provide better results for you. That's what samples are for.